9 thoughts on “Improving a Great Craps Strategy”

1. Fun session..I like it!!!

2. This Improvement on the “Double Tap” …a “light side” only strategy is a good plan. However…

   Going along with well established statistics, of the 6 “shooters” in this game, 4 of the 6 (2/3) 7-Out by roll Point +6. Random Raymond is at the table!!🤪

   With 2/3 of ALL shooters hitting 7-out by Point +6, there’s a Huge hole in Any “light side only” strategy… that’s right…

   Old Random Raymond! You Know this guy because he tosses all those point-7-outs (PSO). He also likes to toss Point Point 7-outs (PPSO)! 🤪

   And if you want 3 points on the table that are Not horn numbers, old Raymond will 7-Out 2 of every 3 times he shoots before you get any money off the table! You just saw it.

   Whenever Raymond’s at the table, it’s gonna be a Cold 🥶 or cool or choppy table, and it’s 7-Out 2 of 3 times before Point + 6. So— Any light side Only strategy you’re gonna go broke, unless…

   In the play above, instead of Only a light side strategy for $44 inside , add either a DP or DC.

   Yep, both plays would have lost 5-7 times, But when replaced with same $50, there’s no loss- just back to zero.

   On the DP there were 11 wins and a theoretical 7 losses (if not replaced), which is 11x $50, or Instead of a loss of $23, there’s a Profit of $550– Or better said, You, the smart “Craps Player” —who’s no longer a “light side only” player More Than DOUBLED your initial bankroll on a cold 🥶 to cool to choppy table!!😳😳😎

   That’s right! You took a $500 bankroll and grew it by $550!!
   — minus the $23 from light side losing play…. Net is Still More Than Double Bankroll at $527!!👍😎

   Because there’s not any 2 or 3’s after the point, the DC didn’t do as well, But still netted right at $250– or 50% increase in bankroll. Again, we had 5 theoretical losses If we did not replace each loss- for a net zero, then we have 5 net wins 5 x $50 =$250!👍😎

   You can blame Random Raymond 🤪, or you can stop losing and follow where the game goes 2 of Every 3 shooters over time.

   Gonna wait for the “Long Roll”? You just had a roll that went for Point +22 rolls!! And still there was a $23 loss!

   Without that Point + 22 roll, your bankroll would be minus another 9 hits- or at least $126 lower.😳

   A roll of 20 or more is gonna typically hit only once an hour at the “average table”. This roll was a fluke with only 6 shooters- should be about 1 every 12, or only 50% chance of that long a roll hitting this “early”.

   Grow to become good “Craps Players” and Not “Light side Only” players who routinely lose over and over and over because of gold old Random Raymond!🤪

   … Hey! I resemble that remark!🤪

3. The last roll you hit the point so the puck would’ve been off so you definitely had a chance to “Color Up” 😂😢 I see it as a W

4. I like it! That dang sevenlol

5. Really enjoy your videos, Jeremy. Especially those I'm in. (GSR) Message me for another way to bet.

6. I like the idea of staying for a long roll, but I like creating a cap for yourself better. Reluctant double tap, 2 hit cap. 🧢 Stay disciplined and pull down after 2 hits once you’ve double tapped. It caps your profit per shooter but you’re pulling down close to the average 6 roll shooter. It will definitely sting watching a long roll, but I bet you end up with more profit capping yourself.

7. By far you hit that 12 like no other

8. This is the exact way I play double tap at my home casino. Works perfectly! After that it is power press and collect to the moon, hopefully…..

9. Unrelated, but as a shooter can you bet the don’t pass? I thought you can but I can’t find any documentation stating one way or the other way. If you can, when do you stop shooting? Because now hitting a 7 is the goal. So do you stop shooting when you hit the point?

Comments are closed.