Learn Baccarat Video Source & Info:
I showed the Good with the Bad with this system let me know what you guys think : )) Be sure to subscribe and hit the Bell : )) Cheers : ))
Source: YouTube
Roulette | Poker | Blackjack | Tips & Strategy
Comments are closed.
All information on this page should be seen as pure entertainment and not pure facts. We disclaims all responsibility for the information from the videos, information and comments.
Always gamble responsibly. You must be at least 18 years old to gamble at the Casinos. Don’t play for more than you can afford to lose.
Visit: https://www.begambleaware.org if you feel that you or someone else have a gambling problem.
Copyright © 2024 Casino Videos
He takes the underdog of the last three decisions (ignoring ties). If one side dominates and is on a winning streak, you lose a ton of money…definitely not an approach to baccarat for me.
Hey bud,
Love your videos , watched all of them , following you and love your ways of thinking .
Just about this strategy….when I was watching his video's I was thinking it would be good to try it with YOUR money management…that was yesterday, and look what you just did lol
Just a note…he is looking for underdog in last 3 outcomes , not in total numer of B and P in the shoe. So you have to look at last 3 outcomes only π
Also wanted to say about Chi Chop Chi Trand….I tried and it did work ….instead of switching after 4 run try after 5…I know is one loss more and one jump on the trand later , but fives are much rarer than fours. And three's where terrible option because they are happening a lot more . Just sharing idea's because I want to see you sucseed…if you do I will too as many other people π
Keep it on , many of us enjoy it π
BronsonFx plays last 3 underdog and if there is a 4 pattern he sits out waits for it to break so PPB,PBP,BPP and PPP bet bank. Opposite patterns bet player
for this system you lose more than you win so he take x2-x4-x8 when he lose
if win he go back 1
if lose he left the shoe π
it 15 loss for 5 win
quite dangerous
if you really have big bank roll better play chi 1 chi 2 , if more secure but also must have stop lose at some terrible shoe
let set if 500 lose for 5 win
and it chances 1% of lossing all 500 unit
it still even thought πππ
Wow what a game, long winded mixing yours and his but it worked in the long run.
Brunson FX system is a FAIL with the third part of the system. It works well for the underdog and 3-1 but the 3 step Marty kill you quick and you can't make up for it. 1 4 or more in a row is -15 units and you have to make it up before you hit another one. If you can find a better MM then you might be able to make it a winning tchnique.
I would post more comments but he says in his last video that he deletes negative comments so you will NEVER see the real comments about his system. Like I said… Its not the systems its the Marty that makes it a loser. Thanks Bac Chi for trying these out.
I know you donβt delete comments cause your an honest guy and really love the videos. I like. Brunson also very much but he flat out tells you that this is the last and best system ever then next day or week itβs no good and need a new system. I like you cause you adapt to new stuff and give it a try and if not you tweak it with comments and your brain. Keep up the great work.
I need a system that beats a 1-2 1-3 1-4 1-2 sequence or a variation. Thanks
Well done on educating your viewer's sensibly. I respect this. Brunson FX was telling people they could quit there jobs and making a living from gambling. He is looking for the holy grail which doesn't exist. You rightly recognise that all systems eventually fail, no matter how you bet or how big the bankroll is. You rightly recognise the house edge over the long run is mathematically impossible to overcome. Enjoyed the video, all the best π