10 thoughts on “Baccarat Winning Strategy BY GAMBLING CHI ..THE DOUBLE PITCH BETTING SYSTEM ..

  1. I've won around 40 units so far on RNG as is. But my light bulb just went off and VG is correct. There is absolutely no benefit to betting both sides, only a down side with always having a commission bet. Just subtract one from the other, and place the bet on the side that is higher. An extra step, but frees up where you can't bet both sides, and less commissions.

  2. Hey Chi, I appreciate the shout out and encouragement from you.
    First I was confused at this.
    Then Im realizing this is HARD work to remember where to bet how much.
    But just ( maybe ) this is the guaranteed way to ALWAYS WIN?

    I hope this is not considered arbitrage betting?
    I have heard people get banned for that.
    But 6 or 7 units per session,
    Why would dealers and casino be upset about that?
    Because when winning moment hits if you don't leave then your behind to NEVER get back in it.

    Ultimately, the reason I would say this wins is because your winning the side that the higher amount of the bet is on way more often.
    Beyond that I don't know. šŸ˜Ž

  3. My limited play with this approach so far is that you can get significant drawdown (about 40 base units for me so far). That is the bad news. The good news is that everytime the system has self corrected and ended with profit. However, if using $25 base units, drawdown can be $1000 or more before the system self corrects. Additionally, I have been trying this system on the game of craps using pass line and don't pass line bets (instead of banker/player for baccarat). The results are very similar…can get big drawdown as bets get big on one side of the ledger and the trend keeps going and going until it self corrects back to equilibrium. But, as noted, the system does seem to self correct at some point and end with profit. Interesting….

  4. I use your system, but call ā€œHouse Wayā€ – ā€œSame as Lastā€ or ā€œSLā€ for short and ā€œChopā€ – ā€œOpposite Lastā€ or ā€œOLā€ for short. I find the labels, SL and OL, to be less confusing. Iā€™ve had good success with this system. Hereā€™s a twist to the system for you to play around with. After 2 losses in a row with either Chop (OL) or House Way (SL), quit betting on it until it wins again and then ups your bet on that side. Example: Place 1 unit bets on both Chop side and House Way side. Chop side loses with one unit. Increase Chop side bet to 2 units and leave House Way side bet at 1 unit. Chop side loses again with 2 units. Stop betting Chop side and continue betting House Way. When Chop side wins again, place a 3 unit bet on Chop. So, any time either side loses 2 times in a row, stop betting that side until it wins again.

  5. Too help simplify things in my mind when betting, I use player one who always bets on the winner (house) and player two who always bets on the loser ( chop).I prefer to use fibannci ( creates bigger bet differentials for more profit) , but if your goal is 3-5 and out, dalembert is effective. Disregard the commission – wins are what matter . This method is a winner. Thanks again Chi…..

  6. I like it. Here is a twist. When at or above a previous chip stack high. Reset both counts to an equal spread at a lower level. Especially when the bets are close to avoid the large bets. Reset 50 and 25 by subtracting 20 from each making it 30 and 5. Just a thought.

  7. Iā€™m not sure about this system because you played against long player streak and streak are common. Better system is play chops until 3 times it loses and then switch to streaks and bet until it loses 2 times with mild progression.

Comments are closed.