Blackjack Strategy Video Source & Information:
This is another test of 3 blackjack betting systems. Which one do you think will win this time?
Martigale betting vs progression betting vs card counting.
This test is not scientific or statistically significant. This is just for fun.
DarkStarBlackjack Book: https://www.amazon.com/DARKSTAR-BLACK…
Patreon: https://patreon.com/darkstarblackjack
Email for Training Opportunities: darkstarblackjack21@gmail.com
Twitter: @DarkStarVegas
Source: YouTube
Great video!!! I look forward to these now that your doing them. Keep up the great videos!!!
Great video!!! I look forward to these now that your doing them. Keep up the great videos!!!
Great video!!! I look forward to these now that your doing them. Keep up the great videos!!!
like your Videos. and i just recently got ok at card counting. How well should i trust cvcx? got a unbalanced card counting system better then hilo light. almost as good as hilo complete but very much simpler. i have been using a 3 step small – and + progression on low counts, and with no wins. go back to 1 unit and stay until win to start any progressions. and go up on units and a 5 step progression on good counts. no wins, will go back to single unit and stay until win to start any progression. I am using card counting modified from red 7 and kiss, i only just got ok at card counting.. Question is?? Should i use my new cvcx system that gets high numbers? is cvcx like real world testing, in your opinion? or should even just learn hilo? now that i got ok at counting , i am still learning.
Right off the bat your testing method is flawed. they should all be betting the same hand. That way they all win or lose together and the only variable is bet selection.
I have a simple, but I suspect loaded question, that only a card counter can really answer. About how many hands of blackjack would you need to play to overcome variance making up the majority of your wins and losses? I suppose what I'm really asking here is at what threshold of hands played, does card counting actually gaurentee winnings?
The reason for my asking, is this. I play spanish 21 and BJ when I have free time. I have separate money put aside for it thatI expect to lose, or rather, trade it for entertainment and drinks.
I do know basic strategy very well for both games. I put time in with CV and flash cards, i wrote things down, I can play perfect basic strat giving the house a less than 1% edge at spanish and just a little higher at the better BJ games.
However I go at most twice a month for a few hours. Would it be reasonable to say that over the 6-7k hand I may play lifetime, variance will make the majority of my wins and losses anyway? Would learning to count, and learning the I18 even be worth it? Sorry this ended up way longer than expected.
Dude your videos are awesome and much better than blackjack appenticeships videos, you keep it simple and let your viewers know that card counting is not a easy way to make money especially if you dont have atleast a 30 grand bankroll to make a living at it. Blackjack appenticeship basically sends a message to people that you can make a living from blackjack with a 2 thousand dollar bankroll and in my opinion that's far from the truth, but they could also win the lottery lol As that old saying goes it takes money to make money.
At 16 vs 10 and RC >0 STAND. Dealer would have busted. Data now flawed.
More plz
Graham7