Craps Tips Video Source:
Here I show how the martingale can be less expensive. I do start with a larger bankroll. Not necessary.
Source: YouTube
Roulette | Poker | Blackjack | Tips & Strategy
Comments are closed.
All information on this page should be seen as pure entertainment and not pure facts. We disclaims all responsibility for the information from the videos, information and comments.
Always gamble responsibly. You must be at least 18 years old to gamble at the Casinos. Don’t play for more than you can afford to lose.
Visit: https://www.begambleaware.org if you feel that you or someone else have a gambling problem.
Copyright © 2024 Casino Videos
I was going to say DGE’s logic with this system is a great combination but you hit it at the 19:20 mark. Keep the great videos coming.
Very intriguing strategy. Immediately start seeing variations that may increase profit. Like an early win covers the Hard 10. Or go up a hundred, and regress the 10 Lay to $200, and reduce the place bets to $15's & $18's. You could even set a win goal of $200 (6 wins) and pull all down, and wait for a ten. So much strength here, when you take the 7's out of the equation
Thanks Jacob, I definitely like this idea better than the full martingale. The idea of waiting for a couple of 10’s first, as per DGE’s tactic appears sound, but then I think, how many collects have I passed up waiting for a crop of 10’s? Also, that is like waiting for sharks to appear, before jumping into the sea, often when a couple of 10’s appear, there are a whole bunch of them just around the corner. I would rather play this until a second 10 in a short number of rolls, then chill with either a break, or a different strategy for a while, then resume with this when that strategy sours. I think this strategy is great, but rather than throwing everything at it during bad patches, do something different in those periods. Cheers
Look at it like this…money you put out on the table is your investment. Money you win is profit. Being able to pull down the Lay and Place bets is your capital. I like this play! Not chasing losses with a Marty. Regressing and preserving capital to reinvest on next roll, etc. is smart. So…what % profit would you be happy with?
Before there was the internet, I read a ton..Sam Grafstein, John Patrick, Sanford Wong, et al…a common theme amongst those big boys was…never let one shooter beat you more than once. A guy rolls a 10…you’re done with that shooter. Stand there and watch the flow of numbers. Just a thought.
Rolling the 10 really eats into the profits you make…..granted you rolled long enough to profit $300 or more…..and then that freak run of 10s will really hurt….you have to be really good at NOT rolling a 10
Should teach Justice to set the dice. Great show and tell when his teacher asks what her learned this summer.
Recouping the loss of a lay "10" bet and keeping all previous profits made while playing using the "Lay 10" system by martingaling the lay bet hoping to roll a "7" before rolling another "10".
Odds of rolling "10(s)" before rolling a "7" :
One "10" rolled before rolling a "7" = 1 out of 3 – 33.3% of the time
Two "10s" rolled before rolling a "7" = 1 out of 9 – 11.1% of the time.
Three "10s" rolled before rolling a "7" = 1 out of 27 – 3.7% of the time.
Four "10s" before rolling a "7" = 1 out of 81 – 1.2% of the time.
Hence,
A shooter with a bankroll of $1,000 or more, playing at a casino that accepts lay bets of up to $600, could martingale one time and recoup his $300 loss (minus 5% vig) and keep his previous winnings 2 out of 3 times and lose an additional $600 – 1 out of 3 times – for a total loss of $900.
A shooter with a bankroll of $3,000 or more, playing at a casino that accepts lay bets of up to $1,800, could martingale a second time and recoup his previous $900 loss (minus 5% vig) and keep his previous winnings 8 out of 9 times and lose an additional $1,800 – 1 out of 9 times – for a total loss of $2,700.
A shooter with a bankroll of $10,000 or more, playing at a casino that accepts lay bets of up to $5,400, could martingale a third time and recoup his previous $2,700 loss (minus 5% vig) and keep his previous winnings 26 out of 27 times and lose an additional $5,400 – 1 out of 27 times for a total loss of$8,100.
A shooter with a bankroll of $25,000 or more, playing at a casino that accepts lay bets of up to $16,200, could martingale a fourth time and recoup his losses (minus 5% vig) and keep his previous winnings 80 out of 81 times and lose and additional $16,200 – 1 out of 81 times – for a total loss of $24,200.
.
Absolutely love it. Done several practice sessions, does very well. Can't wait to try this at the casino.
Realize it is gambling folks walked up to a bubble craps machine first roll was point 10 next roll 10 winner, then point 10 next roll 10 winner none were hard ways still think it's a valid strategy, ironically for about 50 rolls there was one 4 rolled
Interesting.